Authors’ names:
- Nataliia D. Novikova – Linguistics University of Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
Abstract:
The article examines the specifics of using communicative tactics of comparison and contrast in internalized critical discourse. Internalized critical discourse is understood as a linguistic model of inner speech in which an individual criticizes themselves, their appearance, personal qualities, actions, etc. This type of discourse models self-critical thoughts, experiences, feelings, and emotions of a character. The choice of comparison and contrast tactics for analysis in terms of internalized critical discourse is determined by several factors. Comparison and contrast actively involve cognitive processes and, in particular, self-analysis and the process of searching for and making decisions. Moreover, by its nature, contrast can provoke strong negative emotional reactions caused by intrapersonal conflict. In line with the main goal of this study, it has been found that communicative tactics of comparison and contrast are used for both constructive and destructive self-criticism. Data analysis shows that destructive self-criticism dominates in internalized critical discourse, especially when the individual resorts to comparing themselves with idealized standards. The results obtained indicate that such communicative tactics lead to an intensification of negative self-perception and a decrease in self-esteem. The study contributes to understanding the role of communicative tactics of comparison and contrast in the processes of self-reflection and self-regulation, revealing potential directions for further research in the fields of pragmatic linguistics, psycholinguistics, and cognitive linguistics.
| Section | LANGUAGE AND CULTURE |
| DOI: | 10.47388/2072-3490/lunn2024-65-1-86-98 |
| Downloads | 165 |
| Key words | inner speech; interiorized discourse; interiorized critical discourse; communicative tactics; self-criticism |